"Our Democracy is destroying itself because
it abused the rights of freedom and equality, because it taught it's
citizens to consider insolence as a right, illegal acts as a freedom,
rudeness as equality and anarchy as prosperity".
Isocrates (436 -
338 b.C.)
Isocrates, one of the 10 great Athenian rhetors (orators) was not known as one of Greece's famous philosophers in the strict sense of the word, but we think he was and Keith Murphy, seems to agree with us...
Isocrates professes that rhetoric is philosophic in that it teaches morals and
politics.
By "philosophy," Isocrates was describing a theory of culture.
He
believed that philosophy was the study of how to be a reasonable and useful citizen.
Isocrates held that one should deliberate about both one 's own affairs and the affairs of
the state.
He believed that a philosophic education should arouse intense patriotism as
well as constructing a personal philosophy close to the stoic ideal.
While Isocrates did
not believe that virtue could be taught, he argued that it
could be strengthened through training and practice in oratory. (Against the Sophists)
He also argued that moral
argumentation encourages right action because argumentation produces a historical
narrative which uses historic events as precedents for present action.
Therefore one gains moral knowledge by studying public address both as the art of oratory and by
imitating the great speakers for the lessons made by a
man 's life are stronger than lessons furnished by words, as he wrote in Antidosis.
Isocrates also saw
the relationship between morality and oratory as reciprocal.
In the Antidosis Isocrates explains that the more one wishes to persuade one 's fellow citizens, the more
important it is that the orator have a favorable reputation among those citizens.
This
notion served as the basis for the Roman rhetorician Quintilian 's claim that ethos,
or credibility, is a good man speaking well....
In today's context it is rare to find the two together...Where is there morality in leadership? Looking around us today, we see all the troubles foisted on the world by that small group of so-called leaders...fellow 'citizens' in name only, who looking to
enormous personal gain and huge individual profit at the expense of society at large.
In his article 'Who's to blame for the implosion of Greece - and the Global Economy?' Greg Palast writes the following:
The firebombing, the mobs in the streets of Athens, mass
unemployment, the empty pension funds and the angry despair that would
sweep across Europe in 2010 began with a series of banking transactions
crafted in the United States and Switzerland. The plan was 18 years old,
and here it was played out in the streets of Greece, then Spain and
Portugal, and before that in Latin America and Asia. The riot was
written right into it.
When I ask, Who did it? I don’t mean the damaged fool who
threw the Molotov cocktail into a crowded bank. I’m looking for the men
in the shadows, the very big make-the-monkey-jump men who turned
economies into explosive kindling, lit the fuse, then stood first in
line at the fire sale.
Perhaps when we do find the leader that embodies both, ethos or credibility hand in hand with the ability to
speak well, to be a charismatic speaker, to be able to convince...he or she will be able to convince the rest of society to return to Isocrates' principles of being a reasonable and useful citizen of society, to reembrace our basic sense of values for equality and justice for all citizens, then our world will surely take a turn for the better...
geia sas!! na rwtisw kati?:)pou ta vrikate afta??
ReplyDeleteEyxaristoume gia to minima. Parakalo grapste mas sto GlobalGreekWorld papaki Gmail telia com na mas rotisete oti thelete.
ReplyDelete